|
課程名稱 |
社會運動專題討論
Seminar on Social Movement |
|
開課學期 |
109-1 |
|
授課對象 |
社會科學院 社會學研究所 |
|
授課教師 |
何明修 |
|
課號 |
Soc7096 |
|
課程識別碼 |
325 M7400 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
3.0 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
選修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期二6,7,8(13:20~16:20) |
|
上課地點 |
社110 |
|
備註 |
限碩士班以上
總人數上限：15人
外系人數限制：5人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1091Soc7096_ |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
社會運動是一股改變社會的集體力量。許多我們目前習以為常的觀念與制度，實際上往往是來自於先前的群眾抗爭、異端邪說，經歷了共同動員與成功挑戰的過程，最後才成為當前的主流共識。就其起源而言，社會運動通常是代表社會上被排斥的利益與部門，其組織化的過程也常受到國家與統治階級的打壓。然而，弱勢人民如何建構自己的權力組織，持續地與當局互動、施壓，說服旁觀者、取得輿論大眾的同情與支持，分析這些社會運動現象則是需要各種的社會學次領域來作為輔助。
作一種民主政治現象，社會運動表達了不同利益部門的衝突，因此政治社會學的觀點是有助益的。沒有強大的組織資源，弱勢群眾無法改變其既有的命運，因此，組織社會學的洞見可以幫助我們理解社會運動的權力源頭。此外，社會運動並不只是赤裸裸的權力鬥爭、同時也是一種文化的對抗。新時代的社會運動更強調集體認同、生活方式、媒體呈現、運動文化，這些現象也需要文化社會學的分析。本課程希望透過文獻閱讀、討論的方式，來幫助修課同學熟悉當前分析社會運動的諸種觀點。
|
|
課程目標 |
在目前，社會運動的研究已經相當建制化了，已經形成一套標準化的分析概念，甚至也有已經累積聲望的專業研究期刊。這樣的專業化發展趨勢是否意味著了社會運動領域的成熟，亦是意味著其越來越封閉與自我指涉，這是一個經常被討論的議題。有鑑於此，這門課就著重於當代社會運動研究之奠基性文本(founding texts)，我期待課程能夠多花時間探討若干基本概念的意涵與其後續使用。關於晚近的佔領運動，與革命的社會學研究，我在其他課程已經有開授課過，所選擇的閱讀文本不在本課程之重覆。請有興趣的同學可以參考CEIBA之公佈欄。 |
|
課程要求 |
這一門研究所的課程，除了講員授課以外，我期待學生自發性地提出問題，無論是針對講員的授課內容疑義，或是個人心得分享。主動提問與發表看法，不僅是學生的受教權益，也會影響課堂表現的分數。
指定讀物是每次授課的主要內容，希望學生能在上課前先抽空閱讀其內容。每週的讀物都要有學生負責口頭報告，並且準備簡單的書面內容。負責同學除了整理、說明讀物的內容主旨以外，更要加以評論、發表個人感想、提供課堂討論的主題。我會期待同學能夠在課堂報告之前，能夠充份準備，自行將必要的背景知識補足。
為了鼓勵所有同學事先閱讀的習慣，並且避免淪為只有負責口頭報告同學有讀的不良風氣，上課同學最少要繳交10次的「隨堂心得」。「隨堂心得」是針對每週指定閱讀內容(不得與負責口頭報告的內容一樣)的個人提問，其內容務必精簡，篇幅不超過200字。在每週二晚上十點之前，需要將「隨堂心得」email給負責報告的同學，其內容將會成為上課討論的一部分。
期中與期末有兩次的「讀書心得」，每次不得少於4,000字。其內容需要是與課程指定閱讀內容有關，或其運用延伸。讀書心得可以用「研究紀要」(research note)的方式撰寫，建議以課程臚列的相關參考文獻找寫作的靈感或題材。
如果涉及抄襲，依校規處理。第一次讀書心得報告不得晚於第八週，第二次不得晚於第十六週(1/8)。請用MS-Word格式存檔，並且透過CEIBA系統作業區繳交。
每週進行方式如下：
(1)第一堂課：講員簡介(5分鐘)、口頭報告I(20分鐘)、課堂討論(25分鐘)。
(2)第二堂課：口頭報告II(20分鐘)、課堂討論(30分鐘)。
(3)第三堂課：「隨堂心得」之討論(50分鐘)
除了第六週的《自由之夏》以外，本課程的上課講義會在帝宇影印店製作，請同學在第一次上課時登記份數，並且自行前往購買。帝宇是在辛亥路2段155號1樓(台大校園對面)，電話2736-8495。
《自由之夏》將會列為課程指定書籍，保留於圖書館專區。 |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
另約時間 備註： 週二10:00-12:00(請先預約) |
|
指定閱讀 |
見每週進度 |
|
參考書目 |
見每週進度之延長閱謮 |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
口頭報告 |
20% |
|
2. |
課堂討論與參與 |
20% |
|
3. |
隨堂心得 |
20% |
|
4. |
兩次讀書心得報告 |
40% |
|
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
9/15 |
[*為指定閱讀，其他則是延伸閱讀]
課程導論
David. Snow et al. (eds.) (2004) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford: Blackwell Press.
Tilly, Charles (2004) Social Movements, 1786-2004. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Tilly, Charles and Sidney Tarrow (2015) Contentious Politics, revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
|
第2週 |
9/22 |
社會運動的基本邏輯
*Lipsky, Michael (1968) “Protest as a Political Resource.” American Political Science Review (62) 1144-1158.
*Gamson, William A. (1975) The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey, pp. 1-37.
Piven, Frances Fox and Richard A. Cloward (1977) Poor People’s Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Failed. New York: Vintage Books.
Jasper, James M. (2014) Protest: A Cultural Introduction to Social Movements. Oxford: Polity Press.
|
|
第3週 |
9/29 |
不義與社會運動
*Moore, Barrington J. (1978) Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt.
New York: M. E. Sharpe, pp.49-116.
總圖4F科技資料區 HD8450 M66 1978
Tilly, Charles (1999) Durable Inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Gould, Roger (2003) Collision of Wills: How Ambiguity about Social Ranks Breeds Conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Honneth, Axel (1995) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, trans. by Joel Anderson. Oxford: Polity Press.
|
|
第4週 |
10/06 |
運動參與的意義與動機
*Hirschman, Albert O. (1982) Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 3-24, 62-130.
總圖4F科技資料區 HB199 H49 1982
Hirschman, Albert O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Polletta, Francesca (2002) Freedom is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Mansbridge, Jane and Aldon Morris (2001) (eds.) Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
|
第5週 |
10/13 |
個體利益與公共財
*Olson, Mancur Jr. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1-65.
*Oliver, Pamela (1984) “‘If You Don’t Do it, Nobody Else Will’: Active and Token Contribution to Local Collective Action.” American Sociological Review 49: 601-610.
Muller, Edward N. and Karl-Dieter Opp (1986) “Rational Choice and Rebellious Action.” American Political Science Review 80: 471-488.
Hardin, Russel (1995) One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Morris, Aldon D. and Carol McClurg Mueller (1992) (eds.) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
|
|
第6週 |
10/20 |
生命歷程與社會運動
*McAdam, Doug (2011) 《自由之夏》，黃克先譯。台北：群學。
Polletta, Francesca (2006) It Was Like a Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jasper, James M. (1997) The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
|
第7週 |
10/27 |
人際關係與社會運動
*Snow, David, Louis A. Zurcher Jr. and Sheldon Ekalnd-Olson (1980) “Social Networks and Social Movements: A Mircostructural Approach to Differential Recruitment.” American Sociological Review 45: 787-801.
*Opp, Karl-Dieter and Christian Gern (1993) “Dissent Groups, Personal Networks, and Spontaneous Cooperation: The East German Revolution of 1989.” American Sociological Review 58: 659-680.
*Jasper, James. M. and Jane D. Poulsen (1995) “Recruiting Strangers and Friends: Moral Shocks and Social Network in Animal Rights and Anti-Nuclear Movement.” Social Problems 42: 493-512
Munson, Ziad W. (2008) The Making of Pro-Life Activists: How Social Mobilization Works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
|
第8週 |
11/03 |
組織、網絡與動員
*Tilly, Charles (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 52-97.
*Tarrow, Sidney (1994) Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 48-61.
Davies, Gerald et al. (2005) (eds.) Social Movement and Organizational Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
|
第9週 |
11/10 |
資源與社會運動
*McCarthy, John D. and Mayer N. Zald (1994) “Resource Mobilization Theory and Social Movements: A Partial Theory”, and “The Trend of Social Movements in America: Professionalization and Resource Mobilization”, in Social Movements in an Organizational Society: Collected Essay, by Mayer N. Zald, John D. McCarthy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, pp.15-42, 337-392.
*Fireman, Bruce and William A. Gamson (1979) “Utilitarian Logic in the Resource Mobilization Perspective,” in The Dynamics of Social Movements: Resource Mobilization, Social Control and Tactics, eds. by Mayer N. Zald and John D. McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers, pp. 8-44.
Klandermans, Bert, Kriesi and Sidney Tarrow (1988) (eds.) From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research across Cultures. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Rucht, Dieter (ed.) (1991) Research on Social Movements: the State of the Art in Western Europe and the USA. by, Boulder. CO: Westview Press.
|
|
第10週 |
11/17 |
構框與社會運動
*Snow, David A. et al. (1986) “Frame Alignment Process, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51: 464-481.
*McAdam, Doug (1996) “The Framing Function of Movement Tactics: Strategic Dramaturgy in the American Civil Rights Movement.” In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements, eds. by Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338-355.
Benford, Robert D. and David A. Snow (2000) “Framing Process and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611-639.
Stryker, Sheldon et al. (eds.) (2000) Self, Identity, and Social Movements. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
|
|
第11週 |
11/24 |
政治機會與社會運動(I)
*Tilly, Charles (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 98-142.
*McAdam, Doug (1982) Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency 1930-1970. Chicago: Chicago University Press, pp. 20-64.
James Goodwin and James. J. Jasper (eds.) (2012) Contention in Context: Political Opportunities and Emergence of Protest. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
J. Craig Jenkins and B. Klandermans (eds.) (2015) Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movement. London: UCL Press.
|
|
第12週 |
12/01 |
政治機會與社會運動(II)
*Kitschelt, Herbert (1986) “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 16: 57-85.
*Kriesi, Hanspeter, et al, (1995) New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3-81.
Meyer, David S., and Debra C. Minkoff (2004) “Conceptualizing Political Opportunity.” Social Forces 82 (4): 1457-1492.
McCammon, Holly J. et al. (2001) “How Movements Win: Gendered Opportunity Structure and U.S. Women’s Suffrage Movements, 1866 to 1999.” American Sociological Review 66 (1): 49-70.
|
|
第13週 |
12/08 |
認同與新社會運動
*Cohen, Jean L. (1985) “Strategy or Identity: New Theoretical Paradigms and Contemporary Social Movements.” Social Research 52: 663-716.
*Polletta, Francesca and James M. Jasper (2001) “Collective Identity and Social Movement.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 283-305.
Steinberg, Marc W. (1999) Fighting Words: Working-class Formation, Collective Action, and Discourse in Early Nineteenth-century England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Melucci, Alberto (1996) Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
|
第14週 |
12/15 |
抗爭戲碼與社會運動
*Tilly, Charles (1978) From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 143-188.
*Benford, Robert D (1992) “Dramaturgy and Social Movements: The Social Construction and Communication of Power.” Sociological Inquiry 62: 36-55.
Traugott, Mark (ed.) (1994) Repertoire and Cycles of Collective Action. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Clemens, Elizabeth (1997) The People’s Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
|
第15週 |
12/22 |
情緒與社會運動
*Perry, Elizabeth (2002) “Moving the Masses: Emotion Work in the Chinese Revolution.” Mobilization 7: 111-128.
*Gould, Deborah (2002) “Life during Wartime: Emotion and the Development of ACT UP.” Mobilization 7: 177-200.
Jeff Goodwin, et al. (eds.) (2001) Passionate Politics: Emotion and Social Movements. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Ronald Aminzade et al. (2001) Silence and Voices in the Study of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
|
第16週 |
12/29 |
記憶與社會運動
*Armstrong, Elizabeth A. and Suzanna M. Crage (2006) “Movement and Memory: the Making of the Stonewall Myth.” American Sociological Review 71: 724-751.
*Taylor, Verta et al. (2009) “Culture and Mobilization: Tactical Repertoires, Same-Sex Weddings, and the Impact on Gay Activism.” American Sociological Review 74: 865-890.
Cheng, Edmund W. and Samson Yuen (2019) “Memory in Movement: Collective Identity and Memory Contestation in Hong Kong’s Tiananmen Vigils.” Mobilization 24(4): 419-437.
Jeffrey K. Olick (ed.) (2003) States of Memory: Continuities, Conflicts and Transformation in National Retrospection. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
|
|
第17週 |
1/05 |
綜合討論 |
|